The dick act law
Further, the e-mail asserts, preposterously, that the Dick Act is unrepealable, because repeal would violate the Bill of Attainder and Ex Post Facto clauses. A bit of history: in the Attorney General indeed ruled that the militia could not be used outside the US. Have kids, guns are a heirloom to their once their reach a legal age to own the firearms. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Anonymous January 30, PM Reply. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. Besides criminals can get guns off the street easy as hell, or you can even make them in your garage.
Dick Act of 1902
The Dick Act was amended several times. It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty Hardy has practiced law since and has five books and thirteen law review articles in print; one of the articles has been cited by the U. The Constitution may only be changed or amended by a Constitutional Amendment as prescribed by the Constitution. Further, the e-mail asserts, preposterously, that the Dick Act is unrepealable, because repeal would violate the Bill of Attainder and Ex Post Facto clauses. Robert Bork while being questioned for Supreme court was asked why are there so many prisoners in the US?
The Dick Act and Gun Control
All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves. Gibson January 26, PM Reply. Become a member! No legislation is immune from being repealed, and in fact much of the content of the Dick Act has effectively been repealed through the passage of subsequent modifying legislation such as the Militia Act of , the National Defense Act of , and the National Defense Act of
Skip to Main Content - Keyboard Accessible
Description: Robert Kovacs replied to comment from Anonymous July 19, PM Reply Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. In addition, it might be worth checking back also to our recent article by David Hardy , looking in depth at the legal background of the National Guard. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves. A bit of history: in the Attorney General indeed ruled that the militia could not be used outside the US. Leave a comment.
Views: 5758
Date: 09.08.2015
Favorited: 5
User Comments
Post a comment
Comment: